Our September 2025 roundtable brought together a full house of senior investors, regulators, utilities, and policymakers to explore how the macroeconomic environment since the 2022 structural break is reshaping infrastructure investment - and what to do about it.
We set out to answer one central question:
Can ambitious infrastructure investment still be delivered in today’s macro environment?
Macroeconomics underwent a large structural break in 2022…
20-year real bond yield, zero coupon
- Gilt yields highest since 1998
- +100 bps long-term inflation
- Gold price hits record high
- Stock-bond correlation flips
… while infrastructure is shifting from a yield to growth regime
- Electricity Transmission
- Electricity Distribution
- Rail
- Water & Wastewater
2020 – 2025103
Electricity Transmission 7 · Electricity Distribution 11 · Rail 55 · Water & Wastewater 29
2025 – 2030169
Electricity Transmission 33 · Electricity Distribution 13 · Rail 63 · Water & Wastewater 60
63% increase
Show the data as a table
| Electricity Transmission | Electricity Distribution | Rail | Water & Wastewater | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 – 2025 | 7 | 11 | 55 | 29 | 103 |
| 2025 – 2030 | 33 | 13 | 63 | 60 | 169 |
Schematic based on the original figure
The conversation unfolded across three themes:
Global supply (and pricing expectations) of infrastructure capital
Vallorii's VAPRI model shows substantially higher return expectations for equity infrastructure investments (especially for higher risk assets) since 2022.
Roundtable participants stressed the divergence between global and UK conditions. International appetite for infrastructure investment remains strong, particularly for investment in the US.
The UK was seen as a more challenging environment, however: construction costs are high, regulatory uncertainty weighs heavily, and equity investors are increasingly selective. While political ambitions for growth are substantial, capital deployment lags, with the cost of raising even core infrastructure funds now at 12–15% (nominal).
VAPRI ranked a selection of UK infrastructure assets by risk - with gas and electricity distribution assets showing the lowest risk, and greenfield infrastructure projects at the high end. Airport risk changed depending on leverage and regulatory protections in place.
| Risk | Sector | Asset / Company |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gas Transmission & Distribution | Northern Gas Networks |
| 2 | Electricity Distribution | UK Power Networks |
| 3 | Gas Transmission & Distribution | National Gas |
| 4 | Electricity Distribution | National Grid ED |
| 5 | Electricity Distribution | SSEN |
| 6 | Electricity Transmission | National Grid ET |
| 7 | Electricity Distribution | Scottish Power |
| 8 | Gas Transmission & Distribution | Cadent Gas |
| 9 | Gas Transmission & Distribution | SGN |
| 10 | Airports | London Heathrow (excl. 3rd runway) |
| 11 | Water | HARP DPC |
| 12 | Water | Cheddar II DPC |
| 13 | Airports | London Gatwick (excl. 2nd runway) |
| 14 | Electricity Transmission | SSEN |
| 15 | Electricity Transmission | Scottish Power |
| 16 | Airports | Manchester |
| 17 | Water | Beckton Water Recycling DPC |
| 18 | Electricity Generation | Offshore wind (2025 AR7 CfD) |
| 19 | Electricity Generation | Sizewell C (RAB) |
| 20 | Telecoms | 5G Auctions |
| 21 | Electricity Generation | Hinkley Point C (2015 CfD) |
Risk runs from Lower risk (1) to Higher risk (21).
Note: Additional assets are continually added
A majority of attendees felt that the UK infrastructure pipeline cannot be fully delivered without providing higher equity returns, or government underwriting more risk.
How will the infrastructure supply-demand gap be resolved?
- No action needed: capital will flow shortly4
- Consumers/Govmnt provides higher returns to investors11
- Consumers/Govmnt underwrites risks at current conditions14
- Pipeline will not materialize8
Show the data as a table
| Number of responses | |
|---|---|
| No action needed: capital will flow shortly | 4 |
| Consumers/Govmnt provides higher returns to investors | 11 |
| Consumers/Govmnt underwrites risks at current conditions | 14 |
| Pipeline will not materialize | 8 |
Bond Market Risks and the potential for a bond market crash
We stress-tested how bond-market volatility could affect infrastructure returns. Using Heathrow as a case study, VAPRI modelling suggested that highly geared assets face outsized risks - adding 480bps to Heathrow's cost of equity (mitigated by the ability to pass through a portion of increased cost of debt to passengers under the regulatory framework).
Sustained yields above 8% could eliminate dividends - VAPRI calculates an 18% probability of 10-year UK gilt yields exceeding 10% before 2030.
Case study: VAPRI estimates CoE of 7.0-8.5% for Heathrow H8 based on asset-specific forward-looking risks, and regulatory underwriting
Cost of Equity, (real %). Excluding LHR 3rd runway
- CAPM (historical): LHR BP
8.87
- CAPM (historical): CoC Lab, 60% gearing
8.60
- CAPM (historical): CoD (CAA/LHR)
3.7–4.4
- Capital market conditions
6.5–7.7
- Bond market risks
11.3–12.5. + 480 bps. Based on granular 10yr maturity forward yield curve modelling, at 82% gearing of Heathrow
- CoD pass-through to WACC
7.0–8.5. + 50-80 bps. Passthrough of notional gearing (60%) interest payments to passengers
Show the data as a table
| % | |
|---|---|
| CAPM (historical): LHR BP | 8.87 |
| CAPM (historical): CoC Lab, 60% gearing | 8.60 |
| CAPM (historical): CoD (CAA/LHR) | 3.7–4.4 |
| Capital market conditions | 6.5–7.7 |
| Bond market risks | 11.3–12.5 |
| CoD pass-through to WACC | 7.0–8.5 |
1 Current market conditions
6.5–7.7% CoE based on:
- Long-term equity market returns
- 86–108 bps increase in expected market return due current capital supply shortage
2 Asset-specific risk
Asset-specific, forward-looking risk based on AI-generated stochastic modelling
3 Risk allocation
Fine-grained risk allocation within regulatory framework
How to mitigate bond market risks for infra, particularly for heavily geared assets
The group then explored how regulatory financing models affect resilience. Under the UK RAB framework, equity returns rise with leverage—but so too does exposure to bond market volatility. Lower gearing can reduce risk but also significantly dilute returns, underlining the importance of trade-offs and timing in financing strategies - see Heathrow example below.
Under the UK RAB framework, equity returns rise with leverage—but so too does exposure to bond market volatility.
VAPRI shows that lower Heathrow gearing reduces CoE by ~30 bps, but reduces equity IRR by ~380 bps
Lower gearing reduces risk but significantly dilutes equity returns
| Scenario | Cost of Equity, real (%) | Equity IRR, real (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 70% Gearing | 6.7 to 7.9 | 5.2 to 6.8 |
| 82% Actual Gearing | 7.0 to 8.2 | 8.4 to 11.1 |
~30 bps lower CoE as bond yield risk premium falls
~380 bps lower equity IRR as similar returns are measured against higher initial equity investment
Key insights
Hypothetical lower gearing of 70% (due to reduced debt level and higher equity level) would reduce both CoE and equity IRR
Bond yield risk premium falls due to debt–paydown lowering interest expense
Equity IRR falls as cash flows to equity are measured against a larger denominator
WACC-based regulation came under fire from some participants for under-rewarding equity and incentivising higher leverage - with the empirical limitations of CAPM also emerging as a common theme.
We'd be delighted to discuss any of these topics, and show how Vallorii is bringing together advanced financial theory, analytics and AI to transform infrastructure risk and valuation.
Send us a message (opens in a new tab) to get in touch and set up a call. Find out more about applying VAPRI to your asset or portfolio here.
More research

How the UK’s high interest rate environment could re-price infrastructure
High interest rates and investor backlash risk missing capital goals if government can't lock in stability and new financing mechanisms

Lennart Baumgärtner
5 min read

Choice of major water project regulation impacts required equity returns by 220-320bps
Executive summary: Britain’s water‑supply “megaprojects” are arriving: 30 schemes with ~£50bn of lifetime spend, most to be let via...

Lennart Baumgärtner
4 min read
